Thursday 10 April 2014

Published Today: The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World by T.V. Paul

The Warrior State: Pakistan in the Contemporary World by T.V. Paul, James McGill Professor of International Relations, McGill University, is published today. 

In 2013 Pakistan ranked 133rd out of 148 countries in global competitiveness. Currently, Taliban forces occupy nearly 30% of the country, and it is perpetually in danger of becoming a failed state - with over a hundred nuclear weapons that could easily fall into terrorists’ hands. In recent years, many countries across the developing world have experienced impressive economic growth and have evolved into at least partially democratic states with militaries under civilian control. Yet Pakistan, a heavily militarized nation, has been a conspicuous failure. Its economy is in shambles, propped up by international aid, and its political system is notoriously corrupt and unresponsive, although a civilian government has come to power. Despite the regime's emphasis on security, the country is beset by widespread violence and terrorism. What explains Pakistan's unique inability to progress? Paul argues that the geostrategic curse - akin to the resource curse that plagues oil rich autocracies - is the main cause. Since its founding in 1947, Pakistan has been at the centre of major geopolitical struggles - the US-Soviet rivalry, the conflict with India, and most recently the post 9/11 wars. No matter how ineffective the regime, massive foreign aid keeps pouring in from major powers and their allies with a stake in the region. The reliability of such aid defuses any pressure on political elites to launch far-reaching domestic reforms that would promote sustained growth, higher standards of living, and more stable democratic institutions. Paul shows that excessive war-making efforts have drained Pakistan’s limited economic resources without making the country safer or more stable. The book offers a comprehensive treatment of Pakistan’s insecurity predicament. It also compares Pakistan with other national security states, Turkey, Egypt, Indonesia, Taiwan and Korea. 

T.V. Paul is a leading scholar of international security, regional security, and South Asia. His books include: Globalization and the National Security State (co-authored, Oxford University Press, 2010); India in the World Order: Searching for Major Power Status (co-authored, Cambridge University Press 2002); The India-Pakistan Conflict: An Enduring Rivalry (Cambridge University Press, 2005); and South Asia’s Weak States: Understanding the Regional Insecurity Predicament (Stanford University Press 2010).

The Warrior State is published by OUP in hardback, priced in local currencies.

Wednesday 9 April 2014

Malaysian publisher Fixi wins big in London

The winners of The London Book Fair International Book Industry Excellence Awards, in association with The Publishers Association, have been announced at a prestigious Awards ceremony held on the first day of The London Book Fair.

The Awards provide recognition from the UK for the best companies and individuals from across the international publishing industry, as such UK companies are not eligible for the majority of categories.

The line-up of winners was truly global with Belorussia, Pakistan, India, Denmark, Australia, Malaysia, the US and China all coming up trumps.

The US publishing industry led the pack with three winners including the University of Chicago Press in the Academic and Professional category, The Best Translated Book Award won in Literary Translation Initiatives category and Robert Kirkman who created Walking Dead won for the best use of IP. The evening saw a real coup for Fixi, the Malaysian publisher, who picked up The Bookseller International Adult Trade Publisher Award despite having set up only three years ago. They have gained a great reputation at breakneck speed including snapping up huge authors for their translation list.

Jacks Thomas, Director, The London Book Fair, said: “In the course of our preparation for The London Book Fair, my team and I are lucky enough to meet so many inspirational individuals and learn about fascinating initiatives from publishing companies around the world. So it’s wonderful to be able to celebrate the best international talent at our Awards. From new companies like Fixi in Malaysia to publishing stalwarts like renowned Danish agent, Anneli Høier, the winners tonight provide a fascinating showcase for international publishing.”

Richard Mollet, Chief Executive, The UK Publishers Association, said: “The London Book Fair is the perfect location to celebrate the achievements of international publishing and the range of talent on display across the industry. Around the world, publishers are innovating and developing new ideas of how and what publishing could and will look like in the future and these awards are a great opportunity to demonstrate our success as an industry.”

Cortina Butler, Director Literature, British Council, said: “We are delighted that the winning organisations and individuals in this inaugural awards demonstrate the exciting creative entrepreneurship in today’s international publishing industry and the continuing impact of The London Book Fair Market Focus programme.”

Korea Cultural Programme at the London Book Fair

See the previous blog post for an overview of the Korea Market Focus at the London Book Fair.  See here for an update of how it went on day 1. 

Tuesday 8 April 2014

British Council Korea Cultural Programme / London Book Fair

The London Book Fair, one of the world’s most important marketplaces for publishers, starts today, March 8.  Each year, the Market Focus initiative puts the spotlight on links with a specified country or region, highlighting its publishing industry, and the opportunities for conducting book-related business between it and the rest of the world.

This year, Korea is being showcased. This reflects the country’s status as one of the top ten publishing markets in the world, and its expanding reputation within the international literary community, as exemplified by Kyung-sook Shin’s winning the Man Asian Literary Prize in 2011, with Please Look After Mom.

In conjunction with each year’s Market Focus, The British Council runs a cultural programme, to promote exchange between the chosen country’s writers and UK readers, writers, translators and editors. The Korean Cultural Programme, curated in partnership with The Literature Translation Institute of Korea (LTI Korea), will see ten of Korea’s most exciting writers, representing the depth and range of the country’s contemporary literature, involved in events in London, and across the UK.

Last November, in preparation for the Korean Cultural Programme, The British Council and LTI Korea, sponsored 6 UK literary editors to travel to Korea for a scoping and study trip.

Mary Doherty, The British Council’s spokesperson for the Korean Cultural Programme, answered my questions via e-mail.

Republic of Korea (South Korea) is the chosen country. Will North Korea feature at all? 

All the participating writers are from South Korea. However, while literature from North Korea will not be specifically explored, the writers are likely to talk about how the shared history and modern politics of the Korean peninsula influences their writing.

What was achieved by the editors’ trip to Korea? Have any of the participating editors since bought English language rights to Korean books for publication in Britain?  Have any such titles yet appeared in bookshops?

Six editors visited Seoul: Maria Rejt from Mantle (Macmillan), Laura Deacon (Blue Door/HarperCollins), Paul Engles (MacLehose/Quercus), Daniel Seton (Pushkin Press), Katie Slade (Comma Press) and Stefan Tobler (And Other Stories). We were very pleased to have a mix of representatives of larger and more specialist publishing houses in the UK who regularly publish fiction in translation. They met authors, editors, translators and publishers and made very exciting connections. We expect that they will follow up during the London Book Fair – it is too soon for books to be appearing yet.

Has there been a similar programme for Korean editors visiting Britain?  If so, how did it go and what were the results?

We organised a study trip for senior representatives of different parts of the Korean literature sector in the UK in October last year. All the literature professionals visited Edinburgh and Norwich as well as London and our programme was designed to introduce them to as many aspects of the British literature scene as possible including publishers, reader development organisations, arts and live literature venues and bookshops. We expect to see the results in the form of increased exchange of authors and books between Korea and the UK over the next months and years. Already, Fiction Uncovered has begun a partnership with Toji Cultural Foundation to bring UK writers to Korea to participate in residencies.

How and why were the guest Korean novelists selected?

The British Council and LTI Korea chose the writers for their artistic excellence and diversity, after wide consultation with partners, writers, readers and literature experts in both South Korea and the UK in order to find a selection that best represents the range of contemporary writing from South Korea. The group includes novelists and writers of poetry, graphic novels, short stories and children’s books, both established and emerging.

How have British writers responded to the opportunity to meet with their Korean counterparts?

We organised visits by three British writers to Korea last autumn and they were all excited by the opportunity to meet with Korean authors. The children’s writers Tim Bowler and Julia Golding visited the Paju Booksori and WOW Literary festivals in October 2013. Scottish author Kerry Hudson then spent a month in residencies in Korea, first in a traditional community in Gongju and then at Seoul Art Space -Yeonhui. Reciprocal residencies have been arranged for the authors Suah Bae and Kim Aeran who will be spending twelve weeks in the UK’s two UNESCO Cities of Literature, Norwich and Edinburgh respectively, in the spring and summer of 2014.

How have British publishers responded to the opportunity to meet Korean publishers? Are they more concerned with selling rights to the Koreans, than buying rights from them?

We had more applications for the editors’ trip than we had places and we understand that the diaries of Korean publishers visiting London are filling up with meetings where they might sell rights. Certainly those editors who travelled to Seoul in November came back with a real enthusiasm for buying rights to Korean works.

Do you have any events just for booksellers? Do you think booksellers will be supportive of Korean literature in translation in Britain? 

All the evening events are open to everyone, including booksellers, and will give an insight in to the breadth and depth of Korean writing. Because of its history and geographical position, Korea is a country that interests many people – even those who do not usually buy literature in translation. Modern Korean literature is window on contemporary Korean society and the recent past and it deserves to take its place with other novels in translation.

What do you hope the Korean cultural focus will achieve?

The Cultural Programme will do much to open doors, creating cultural connections and promoting greater understanding of the UK in South Korea and of South Korea in the UK. We know from previous cultural programmes we’ve run that many organisations and individuals will make the most of the opportunities we’ll present to develop longer-term partnerships between the UK and South Korea. 

The British Council’s Arts programme in South Korea is facilitating new ways for people in the UK and South Korea to connect and understand each other and share skills and innovations.  Our projects are designed collaboratively with partners, and in response to needs and opportunities in both countries.  This coming year we will be working with partners across South Korea and the UK on exciting projects to bring together writers and professionals through exchanges, festivals and professional development activities

Browse the Project

These are the ten writers featured in the Korean Cultural Programme.  Click on the names to check out the links.

·       Kim Insuk
·       Yoon Tae-ho
·       Hwang Sun-mi
·       Kim Young-ha
·       Yi Mun-yol
·       Hwang Sok-yong
·       Han Kang
·       Lee Seung-U
·       Kim Hyesoon
    Kyung-sook Shin

Friday 4 April 2014

Questions and Answers With Robin Hemley

Newly established Yale-NUS sees two countries, cultures and universities collaborating to provide a world-class liberal arts education in Singapore. After 9 years as Director of the Nonfiction Writing Program at The University of Iowa, Robin Hemley is now Writer-in-Residence and Director of the Writing Program at Yale-NUS.

Robin’s own work includes Turning Life into Fiction, an in-depth guide to converting real life into good storytelling. The book covers a wide range of subjects, including how to record and generate ideas from daily life and how to write effectively using true anecdotes, real places, and real people.

I interviewed him via e-mail.

So: questions and answers with Robin Hemley…

What are the aims and ambitions of the Yale-NUS creative writing program? How far are you meeting them?

We/I are starting off modestly.  At the moment, I AM the creative writing program.  I’ve taught for 25 years in various programs and have been a program builder at all of these places.  I very much consider myself a world citizen and have spent my career building community and trying to build bridges between writers across boundaries.  When I directed the Nonfiction Writing Program at The University of Iowa, I founded an international conference, NonfictioNOW, and brought writers from around the world to Iowa, then took the conference last time to Melbourne, Australia.  I’ve spent much of the last fifteen years giving writing workshops all over the world, from Fiji to the Philippines, and it’s always been my passion to bring writers together.  My father and mother were both translators of the Nobel Laureate Isaac Bashevis Singer, and while I’m not a translator, I, too, have a drive to create audiences for writers across national boundaries.  This is what I hope to continue at Yale-NUS, in Singapore, and in the region, a continuation of something I’ve been doing for years.  This is a personal ambition.  Regarding my ambitions for the program, let’s wait and see.  I hope first to create creative writing offerings and opportunities for the students and faculty of Yale-NUS, and beyond that, I hope to forge alliances with other organisations that promote contemporary world literature, and see where that takes us. 

Where do the faculty come from?  Asia?  The West? Do you think it matters?

As I said, I’m the faculty in creative writing at the moment.  I was born in New York, but I’ve lived in various places around the world, and I consider the Philippines my second home.  My wife is from the Philippines and I have many friends and family members there. 

The Writers’ Centre at Yale-NUS, which I direct, has already started a reading series which brings writers from around the world and from around the region to Singapore.  This year, we’ve brought Pico Iyer, Gina Apostol, and Arvind Mehrotra, and Alvin Pang, to name a few, to campus, and Alvin will be teaching a poetry course for us next year.  In the future, I hope to bring visiting distinguished writers from around the world and region to teach for periods from a semester to a year.  So, yes, it matters.  Diversity matters, and not only diversity of national origin and ethnicity, but diversity in terms of the traditions these writers represent and the various forms in which they practice. 

The language of tuition is English.  Do you think that matters?  If so, why?  If not, why not?

I’m not sure I understand this question.  I don’t know what you mean by “the language of tuition.”  The language of tuition, as far as I can see, is the Singapore dollar. 

(Nobody wants writers to feel they need to apologise if they choose to write in English, but I was trying to elicit an opinion on the dominance of English; the fact that writers in Asia writing in their mother tongues often find it difficult to find a translator, and almost invariably find it difficult to find an English-language publisher, and hence an English-speaking readership.  I should have asked:  do you think writers in Asia feel compelled to write in English?  Does that matter? )

Where do the students come from?  Only from Singapore?  From all over Asia?  All over the world? 

The students come from all over the world.  60% are Singaporean, and some are dual citizens.  I believe the students come from seventy different countries and six continents. 

A son or daughter going into writing is a nightmare scenario for Asian parents.  Agree? Disagree? Would you ever attempt to change the mind of a tiger mother who was distraught her child wanted to make a career out of writing?  What, if anything, would you say to try to win her over?

I don’t necessarily disagree, but I also don’t think that Asian mothers are unique in this respect.  I’d say in most places in the world, parents worry about children who go into the arts.  But I also think that people who go into the arts tend to be remarkably strong people who can’t even be dissuaded by tiger mothers.  Somehow, we do have artists and writers in the world, and many great ones come from Asia.  Think of all the great writers and artists from India and China.  Certainly, some of them had to rebel against parents who didn’t want their children to waste their lives as artists.  But I’m not a proselytiser and I don’t see it as my role to intervene between a tiger mom (or dad) and her child.  I wouldn’t want my child to become an economist, and if I argued with my child about this, and said, “Why do you want to waste your life as an economist?” I wouldn’t expect her economics prof (spawn of the devil, no doubt) to try to talk me out of my opposition.  Why should I be any different?  If she truly wanted to become an economist, I imagine she’d find a way with or without my approval, and that would be the first test of her commitment to her chosen field.  If I were able to talk her out of being an economist and she instead followed the family tradition and became a writer, I’d say she probably didn’t want to be an economist all that much in the first place.  I feel the same way about writers who must face the opposition of their parents to do what they want to do. 

Do you think writing can be called a profession? 

Of course it’s a profession, but only a tiny fraction of writers solely support themselves by their writing.  The writer Lewis Hyde wrote an important book a couple of decades ago called The Gift, in which he argues that writing and art in general needs to be looked at as more than a commodity, but as a gift to society by the artist.  We can’t judge art and say, a soft drink, by the same standards. Some artists make plenty of money in their lifetime from their writing and art, but they’re a rarity.  The point is that art can’t be judged by how popular it is necessarily or by how much money it makes. Writing can be seen as a profession, certainly, but that’s not all it is.  It’s an artistic pursuit. 

Do many of your Yale-NUS students want to set up shop as writers?  Or are most of them doing this to fulfill an interest they don’t see lasting long beyond their student years? 

I wouldn’t want to generalise about my students or presume to know what they’re thinking at this point.  Yale-NUS just started and my students are ALL Freshmen.  I don’t think most people know what they want when they’re Freshmen.  It’s not my job to recruit writers, to make tiger moms hate me for luring their children to the dark side.   It’s my job to offer opportunities and to teach writing.  What my students do with this is up to them.  But I should add that I believe that people who learn how to express themselves imaginatively in writing are going to be able to use those same skills in whatever profession they go into.  I’m not only teaching them how to write, but how to think creatively – or at least, I’m allowing them to think creatively – something that’s too often discouraged – and that’s something that will serve them well throughout their lives. 

If you have students who do want to set up as professional writers, do you feel honour bound to try to dissuade them?

No, why would I do that?  It’s not a cult.  But you have to define your terms here.  What do you mean by “professional” writer?  The idea of a professional poet, for instance, is almost absurd.  There are some few poets who make a living after many years with speaking engagements, but most poets hold down another job.  One of the most famous Western poets, Wallace Stevens, worked for an insurance company.  Another, William Carlos Williams, was a doctor.  There’s no reason why you can’t write and do something else.  Some writers, such as myself, go into academia, but others hold down all sorts of other jobs.  They’re not mutually exclusive, but if you want to write seriously, you have to find a job that allows you the time and energy to write.  Straight out of graduate school, I had a 9-5 job for a year and a half in Chicago.  The job was the kind at which I could do what I needed to do and then spend much of the rest of the day writing without in any way compromising my effectiveness in my job.  I wrote half the stories in my first collection at that job.  My thoughts on this subject boil down to this:

1.     If you want to write, you’ll write.
2.     You probably won’t earn a living at it. But . . .
3.     See number 1. 

How do you feel about preparing students for a profession where most practitioners can expect to earn peanuts if they’re lucky, and nothing if they’re not?  Do you ever worry creative writing courses are immoral, in producing a massive over supply of writers the world doesn’t need?

Immoral?  Are philosophy courses immoral?  Are literature classes immoral?  What’s immoral about learning how to write?  I’d say it’s more immoral teaching people that art is frivolous and that you should only care about money.  In fact, studies have shown that these immoral writers the world doesn’t need actually make people more compassionate and smarter: writing and reading both achieve this.  The mistake, again, is to think that all writers need to make a living at writing just because they’ve taken a few college courses in it.  Certainly, it would be immoral to tell someone they’re so talented that they should quit all their other studies and simply become poets, but who does that?  I wouldn’t do such a thing, nor would anyone I know, but if someone comes to me and wants to learn something about writing, I’m happy to share everything I know. 

I should also add that I know a lot of writers.  Most of them seem as happy as anyone I know and they lead fulfilling lives.  At some point or another someone has tried to dissuade them from writing, I’m sure.  My good friend Bret Lott was told by one graduate school teacher that he had made a mistake and that he should not become a writer (the teacher thought he was acting morally, I suppose).  Bret went home to his wife dejected and told her what his teacher had said, and his wife, Melanie told him she wasn’t going to let him quit after they’d moved across the country to be there.  Bret is now more famous than his teacher ever was – about fifteen years ago, Oprah picked one of Bret’s novels for her famous book club.  Another friend of mine, the Hong Kong writer Xu Xi (a classmate of Bret’s as it turns out), took another route.  After grad school, she worked for many years in the corporate world, mostly in Asia, before leaving it with enough earnings so she didn’t have to be too concerned with money.  Meanwhile, she pursued her writing career and is now one of Hong Kong’s leading writers.  In other words, there are many different routes to writing, none of them easy, but for some of us, absolutely fulfilling. 

There is no money in Asian Books Blog, and nobody ever gets paid to contribute, so, to be fair, I should ask if you in turn think I am immoral for asking writers to write for nothing? 

No.  Actually, I’ve written on this subject. For free.  There are some things we’re willing to write for free and some things we aren't willing to write for free.  Joan Didion once said that if no one paid her to write, she would never write, but most of us aren’t Joan Didion.  It’s certainly better if you can pay writers, but sometimes exposure is worth as much as money and sometimes we write for free because we believe the subject is important and we have thoughts on it. 

Do you think writing for the public for nothing can only ever be out of vanity?

No, more often than not, it’s out of generosity, I think.  When we speak, do we only speak out of vanity?  Writing is a form of communication, and the reasons for communication are complex and myriad.  There’s never one reason for it. 

What do you think about blogging  / digital media / social networking etc., all of which increase writers’ freedom and ability to get their work out there, but undermine their ability to get paid?  Do you think overall the trade-offs work for or against writers? And should anybody care, apart from writers?

Not everyone writes to get paid, though sometimes it works out for writers, and most often it doesn’t.  That’s no different from the way it’s been for centuries.  Regardless of the media or platform, that’s not going to change. 

Anything else you want to say?  Anything you think I should have asked, but didn’t?  

You should come to some of our readings.  In fact, anyone reading this within shouting distance of Singapore should come to the readings.  They’re open to the public.   We don’t have our full slate of visitors set up for 2014/15 yet, but we’ll  have the slate of readers available by June 2014 at the latest and people can email me directly to find out who is reading and when, if they’re interested.  We’d gladly welcome the public to our readings and receptions.